Criteria for Rigor in Visualization Design Study
- Submitting institution
-
City, University of London
- Unit of assessment
- 11 - Computer Science and Informatics
- Output identifier
- 825
- Type
- D - Journal article
- DOI
-
10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934539
- Title of journal
- IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
- Article number
- -
- First page
- 87
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1077-2626
- Open access status
- Compliant
- Month of publication
- August
- Year of publication
- 2019
- URL
-
-
- Supplementary information
-
-
- Request cross-referral to
- -
- Output has been delayed by COVID-19
- No
- COVID-19 affected output statement
- -
- Forensic science
- No
- Criminology
- No
- Interdisciplinary
- No
- Number of additional authors
-
1
- Research group(s)
-
-
- Citation count
- 2
- Proposed double-weighted
- No
- Reserve for an output with double weighting
- No
- Additional information
- First set of criteria for applying interpretative epistemologies to visualization research, building on Meyer’s (SCI Utah) high-profile Design Study Methodology (Sedlmair et al, 2012). Work selected for prestigious 'Provocations' opening session at IEEE Information Visualization (A* CORE; flagship conference and leading venue in discipline area), Vancouver, 2019, 24% acceptance. Tested in IEEE VIS-2020 paper (Rogers et al, 2020); presented at invited seminars including JPL NASA, Pasadena, CA, @meyer; and used in NSF MultiNet phylogenetic analysis project NSF OAC 1835904, to call for transparency in CHI-2020 panel (Talkad Sukumar, 2020), and as basis for CHI-2020 Best Paper (Syeda et al, 2020).
- Author contribution statement
- -
- Non-English
- No
- English abstract
- -
