Impact case study database
Search and filter
Filter by
- Queen's University of Belfast
- 14 - Geography and Environmental Studies
- Submitting institution
- Queen's University of Belfast
- Unit of assessment
- 14 - Geography and Environmental Studies
- Summary impact type
- Cultural
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
In 2014, the centenary of World War One (WW1) presented a significant challenge for heritage bodies and communities across the UK and Ireland, as well as a great opportunity on how to commemorate past conflict inclusively. Led by historical geographers at Queen’s University Belfast (QUB), an AHRC-funded WW1 Engagement Centre—“Living Legacies 1914-18”—partnered with communities and institutions nationally and internationally to co-produce research sharing untold experiences of war, so enhancing inclusive cross-community understanding of contested heritage. Over six years, Living Legacies developed spatial and digital humanities tools and methods to deliver a public engagement programme that supported 120 community centenary projects in Britain and Ireland, reached 16,225 event participants, and 210,000+ exhibition visitors, as well as leveraging c.£900k for community coproduction projects between 2014-19, delivering significant policy-recognised benefits and impacts in the UK and Ireland.
2. Underpinning research
In 2013, “a major call was issued by the AHRC for proposals from consortia of research organisations to support and encourage the extensive interest in exploring WW1 and its legacy among communities in the UK.” In 2014, a successful bid led by Lilley and Ell created the ‘Living Legacies 1914-18’ WW1 Engagement Centre (EC), founded on their long track-record of published and funded research at QUB on digital and spatial humanities in historical geography, coupled with Lilley’s established impact projects in cultural heritage.
With its historical-geographical grounding, combined with an interdisciplinary approach, Living Legacies engagement was underpinned by a strong spatial emphasis and community coproduction projects, as well as a strong sensitivity to the importance of place and landscape in constructing and conveying cultural and social identities. Both drew directly on the geographical research of Lilley and Ell. To this end, as an AHRC WW1 engagement centre only Living Legacies was directly underpinned by geographical research, drawing on geospatial and digital techniques and methodologies which give new grounding and provide new spaces for engagement around contested heritage.
Key research that directly shaped and guided the creation, development and delivery of Living Legacies includes, first, Lilley’s spatial humanities research, particularly using geovisualisation, digital methodologies and geospatial technologies, especially mapping as an interpretative space for exploring alternative narratives about past places, as set out by Lilley and Dean (2015) [R1]. Since 2003, Lilley successfully developed these themes through a series of AHRC-funded digital projects on cultural heritage, including Mapping Medieval Chester (2008-9) and City Witness (2012-14). Each of these major inter-disciplinary research projects forged strong pathways to impact, through web-GIS resources, map-based exhibitions, historical walking trails, and geospatial datasets, reaching across heritage and community sectors (e.g. medievalchester.ac.uk; medievalswansea.ac.uk/en/) [R2]. In 2018, in recognition of his leading contribution to contemporary geographical research methods, including GIS and digital mapping, the Cuthbert Peek Award was conferred on Lilley by the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG).
A second critical area of underpinning research for Living Legacies is QUB expertise by Ell on digital humanities, GIS applications and historical gazetteers and datasets, including spatial analyses specifically relating Britain and Ireland’s social and historical geographies. [R3] This research drew on major collaborative projects including digitisation and ICT with government and public bodies UK and Ireland wide, through the Centre for Data Digitisation and Analysis (CDDA) based in Geography at QUB. Founded in 1999 and directed by Ell, CDDA has consistently pioneered linkages between information technologies and humanities research internationally, and delivered major innovative digital projects such as A Vision of Britain through time 1801-2001 and Digitising Scotland. This research shows how GIS-based analysis makes a clear contribution to our knowledge of historical geography, in particular how historical GIS can and is developing our knowledge of the past, and challenging orthodox historical explanations. [R3] Especially significant here is Ell’s research on exploring the spatial histories of social divides in Ireland using census data and GIS. [R4]
Through these interdisciplinary projects and outputs, Lilley and Ell’s combined experiences of GIS and geospatial applications in cultural heritage and digital engagements shaped and underpinned Living Legacies engagement and impacts across the Centenary period, directly enabling community researchers to co-produce digital and geospatial resources and outputs, building their field-/place-based, mapping and landscape knowledge, skills and capacity on an inclusive cross-community basis. This ‘connected communities’ approach was of critical importance to policy makers in the context of Living Legacies in Northern Ireland, using a contested centenary of a past conflict to bridge community divides, and lay at the heart of the research undertaken through the centre’s engagement programmes between 2014-19. In 2019, these engagements were documented in a legacy web-site created for Living Legacies 1914-18 (http://www.livinglegacies1914\-18.ac.uk/\), and the WW1 Community Platform, archiving digital content and objects from NLHF and AHRC WW1 EC projects (http://ww1digitalportal.org.uk/\), both web-resources created by QUB Geography and CDDA and coordinated by Lilley and Ell.
Living Legacies drew upon both previous research and experiences gained through six years of engagement activities, and pro-actively developed new methods and tools for exploring the contested heritage of WW1, forming a basis for further research outputs focusing on historical-geographical approaches in community mapping and heritage engagement. [R5, R6]. This research arising through Living Legacies engagement has itself thus furthered geographical debates on ‘citizen cartography’, participatory GIS and ‘inclusive heritage’. This iterative research>impact>research process reflects the recursive nature of Living Legacies ‘engaged research’ between 2014 and 2020, drawing on previous research by Lilley for developing public engagement and participation programmes for the centre activities, and then feeding this back into an international research agenda through collaborative published outputs.
3. References to the research
[R1] Lilley K D and Dean G (2015) ‘A silent witness? Medieval urban landscapes and unfolding their mapping histories’, Journal of Medieval History 41(3), 273-291.
DOI 10.1080/03044181.2015.1048094
[R2] Lilley K D (2011) ‘Digital cartographies and medieval geographies’, in Daniels S, DeLyser D, Ketchum J & Richardson D (eds.) Envisioning Landscapes, Making Worlds. Geography and the Humanities (London: Taylor and Francis), 25-33.
[R3] Gregory I and Ell P S (2007) Historical GIS: Technologies, methodologies and scholarship (Cambridge: CUP).
[R4] Gregory I N, Cunningham N A, Ell P S, Lloyd C D & Shuttleworth I G (2013) Troubled Geographies: A Spatial History of Religion and Society in Ireland (Bloomington: Indiana UP).
[R5] Lilley K D (2017) ‘Commemorative cartographies, citizen cartographers and WW1 community engagement’, in Wallis J and Harvey D (eds), Commemorative Spaces of the First World War: Historical Geographies at the Centenary (London: Routledge), 115-134.
[R6] Tracey R and Lilley K D (2020) ‘Inclusive heritage, conflict commemoration and the Centenary of World War One in Northern Ireland’, in O’Reilly G. (ed.) Places of Memory and Legacies in an Age of Insecurities and Globalization (New York: Springer International), 415-36. DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-60982-5_19
4. Details of the impact
Over the period 2014-19, a team of 21 ‘Living Legacies’ EC researchers led by Lilley and Ell created a set of geographical and geospatial tools, methods and approaches to address community groups and projects needs and interests in commemorating the Centenary of WW1 in new and meaningful ways. Funded through the UKRI AHRC (£1.7m), Living Legacies centre researchers collaborated nationally and internationally across research, community, heritage and policy sectors, resulting in highly successful outcomes and impacts for the funder, the results and impacts of which were summarised by the AHRC’s 2020 policy report, “Relationship Brokering: Reflections on Community Engagement from AHRC’s World War One Engagement Centres”, and a series of linked stakeholder and policy events in 2019 around the UK [LL1].
Schematic diagram of ‘ Living Legacies 1914-18 ’ Engagement Centre collaborators, partners, networks and projects, leveraging c.£900k for community coproduction (2014-19) [ LL1]
- Public engagement and community upskilling through digital and spatial humanities:
Through 120 community projects and 470 supported events, and focusing on digitally exploring, visualising and recording the legacies of WW1 in localities and landscapes, Living Legacies community engagement (archived at livinglegacies1914-18.ac.uk) resulted in significant impacts for key UK agencies, bodies and organisations leading WW1 Centenary programmes:
- Living Legacies was established as part of a AHRC-NLHF strategic partnership, created in 2014. Working collaboratively with community groups UK-wide, our digital and place-based projects and programmes impacted on the successful delivery and reach of the £94 million Heritage Lottery Fund (now National Lottery Heritage Fund) community centenary objectives creating 1,900 WW1 projects across the UK, within which NLHF commended how:
“Living Legacies has been central to helping the National Lottery Heritage Fund achieve the aims of its strategic partnership with AHRC to support First World War Centenary projects to increase public understanding of the war…” [LL2]
- A series of UK-wide community-based research and upskilling workshops on landscapes, web-GIS and field-survey were developed and delivered by Living Legacies as part of the Council for British Archaeology’s (CBA) major “Home Front Legacy” (HFL) Centenary crowdsourcing project, recording 5,660 WW1 heritage sites right across the UK in partnership with Historic England , with the result that:
“The range of things we [CBA] could offer at the workshops increased because of collaborating with Living Legacies – we were able to give a much broader range of skills development… to develop projects… to provide advice on fieldwork… at sites, identifying sites and recording them – all of those skills can be taken on to be used in any area of heritage”. [LL3]
- In 2018 for the major RAF100 commemorative programme and working closely with the Royal Air Force in Northern Ireland, Living Legacies led and developed a digital, GIS-based toolkit (called “ Action Stations!”) for engaging Air Cadet Squadrons and young people in interpreting and recording historic airfields and aeronautical sites through using maps, aerial photographs and local fieldwork and site-recording. This collaboration had a significant impact on the efficacy of the RAF100 programme, as attested by the RAF:
‘The work undertaken by Living Legacies has helped increase the RAF’s profile in NI and brought our history to life for a wide audience…Living Legacies’ efforts in helping to achieve these aims has been invaluable’. [LL4]*
- Exploring contested and conflict heritage through digital and spatial humanities:
The Centenary of WW1 and especially commemorating critical historical events of 1916 in Ireland had potential to heighten divisions between Nationalist and Loyalist communities, a key policy concern identified by UK and RoI governments in 2014. Living Legacies researchers addressed this directly through creating an outreach programme built around digital and spatial technologies to work with NI local communities to explore WW1 through ‘sharing heritage’, with significant impacts highlighted by the Royal Geographical Society [LL5].
‘The Geography of Service and Death ’—A community coproduced GIS and web-map, created by collaboration between NLHF-funded East Belfast & Great War project and Shankill Area Social History group through crowdsourcing and partnership with Living Legacies researchers [ LL1/LL8] .
Cross-community research impacts in NI focusing on sharing WW1 heritage involved a close collaboration with National Museums Northern Ireland (NMNI) creating the “Remembering 1916” exhibition in 2016 [LL6], and the NI “Decade of Centenaries” programme [LL7], as well as leveraging and supporting a series of cross-community NLHF-funded WW1 Centenary inclusive heritage projects in NI, including Shankill Area Social History group (£10k), “Battlebags and Blimps” project with Carrickfergus Museum (£10k), East Belfast & the Great War (£10k), and a Peace-IV funded project with Down County Museum (£60k). [LL8]
These collaborations forged deep partnerships between community groups from different backgrounds and heritage stakeholders and research bodies, with workshops, field-surveys, map and landscape analyses, led by Lilley and the Living Legacies EC team, resulting in coproduced outputs, including digital-platforms, events and exhibitions (as set out in LL1 and summarised by project leads in reflective case-studies in LL8]. Through exploring legacies of WW1, the impacts of this six-year programme have achieved wide recognition by NI and UK policy-makers as meaningful and significant for enhancing cross-community relations:
- Living Legacies’ impact on enhancing community relations through exploring and sharing contested heritage is commended by the Community Relations Council (CRC). Funded by the Northern Ireland Executive, CRC was established in 1990 to lead and support change towards reconciliation, tolerance and mutual trust in Northern Ireland, and to implement the NI Executive's ‘Good Relations Strategy’ – Together: Building a United Community. The CRC notes:
'It is in no small part down to Living Legacies that community groups and the public are coming to an understanding of the complexity of this period and that our sense of identity is becoming more permeable. In our experience communities and individuals are interested in the broader narratives, however, without assistance and expertise being made available it is difficult to make this a reality.’ [LL9]
- UK government recognition and endorsement of the significance of cross-community impacts of Living Legacies’ in Northern Ireland is evidenced by Department of Culture Media and Sport (DCMS) in Westminster . In July 2019 a report from DCMS Select Committee outlining ‘Lessons from the First World War Centenary’ specifically identified “the academic engagement centre at Queen’s University Belfast” in achieving this, and in commenting on the wider significance of this outreach work the UK Prime Minister's special representative for the World War One centenary, Dr Andrew Murrison MP, stated:
“It has been that Irish dimension that has been the most heartening and, for me, probably one of the most productive things that we have achieved”. [LL10]
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
[LL1] AHRC Policy Report, ‘Relationship Brokering: Reflections on Community Engagement from AHRC’s World War One Engagement Centres’ / Living Legacies 1914-18 Report (2020)
[LL2] Letter from Karen Brookfield, former director of the National Lottery Heritage Fund’s First World War Centenary Programme (March 2019).
[LL3] Council for British Archaeology and English Heritage, ‘Home Front Legacy’ project report, quote from interview with Claire Corkill (Development Manager, Council for British Archaeology): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6yfWfzOKVM&t=196s [quote @13’50”] (May 2020).
[LL4] Letter from Tara Scott, Wing-Commander of the Royal Air Force (December 2018).
[LL5] Royal Geographical Society (with IBG) (2020) Living Legacies highlights the untold story of WW1 in Northern Ireland. (https://www.rgs.org/geography/advocacy\-and\-impact/impact/livinglegacies/\).
[LL6] Evaluation Report, Remembering 1916, Ulster Museum: National Museums Northern Ireland, Belfast (2016).
[LL7] National Lottery Heritage Fund/Community Relations Council NI, ‘Decade of
Anniversaries Toolkit: Understanding Our Past, Shaping Our Future’ (2018).
[LL8] Tracey, R & Lilley, K. (2020) ‘Inclusive Heritage in Practice: Lessons from the Living Legacies 1914-18 WW1 Public Engagement Centre’, Community Co-production Project Case Studies, with foreword by Paul Mullan (Director, NLHF Northern Ireland).
[LL9] Letter from Deirdre MacBride, former Cultural Diversity Programme Director, Community Relations Council Northern Ireland (June 2016).
[LL10] House of Commons: Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee, ‘Lessons from the First World War Centenary’ (Thirteenth Report of Session 2017-19 – July 2019) [quote on p.9].
- Submitting institution
- Queen's University of Belfast
- Unit of assessment
- 14 - Geography and Environmental Studies
- Summary impact type
- Legal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
Law enforcement, search and rescue often require forensic search in challenging aquatic environments such as ponds, rivers, ditches and flooded quarries for recovery of human remains, drugs, weapons, explosives and toxic materials. Research at QUB (lead: Ruffell) has developed new methodologies using integrated GI Science and Geoscience tools for assisting the search for buried and water-sunken objects, especially human remains. The impact of this work has included:
12 searches for homicide/suicide and drug-related incidents throughout the UK;
6 training events in UK, Italy, Australia, Argentina, Brazil and Colombia, which have upskilled law enforcement agencies on aquatic search approaches;
Significant engagement with community, police and other groups, and articles (e.g. Police Professional, The Conversation) promoting geoforensics to wider audiences.
2. Underpinning research
Developing strategies for Geoforensic search methods in freshwater environments
The forensic search for objects submerged in water is under-developed compared to terrestrial searches, providing the impetus for this research. The objective in water-based search research has been to develop a sequential multi-proxy strategy. This includes: GIS-based desktop study; Sonar; geophysics [R1] (especially WPR - water-penetrating radar) and survey endoscope methods that provide targets for scent dogs and divers [R2] in the search of water for items of forensic interest. Working with our professional search partners, we have developed a three-step methodology for forensic search in freshwater environments, detailed below:
First, a GIS-based desktop study of the environment is undertaken, which includes hydrological navigation/investigation and survey of the area (e.g., models of water flow, which may transport missing objects **[R3]**); analysis of any past search reports or surveys for sand/aggregate extraction; mining/hydrocarbon exploration; dredging of sediment; engineering works; and navigation, both historical and recent). The chemistry of the water and composition of the basal sediment are both key in selecting possible methods to be deployed in the search, because some search tools work optimally in specific environments. This work focusses on the commonly-encountered, yet unsolved issue of where items of forensic interest are sunken (the concept of ‘ sinkability’* [R4] into subaqueous sediment). As the casework and letters of support here demonstrate, this is of major concern in serious crime investigations, as well as searches for missing persons and environmental crime (e.g. illegal waste dumps in water such as abandoned flooded quarries **[R1]**).
Second, intelligence informs the search personnel of the nature of the target. A key objective in searching water is finding human remains (due to accident, suicide, homicide or genocide) and our work has developed and refined approaches in this area [R2, R3].
Third, evaluation and selection of aqueous search assets is undertaken (e.g., remote sensing data, geophysics, search dogs deployed on boats), all field tested and georeferenced by GPS [R5, R6]. Critical here are the nature of the target (e.g. size, makeup, state of preservation), the type of the enclosing medium (e.g. residing in the water column; sediment-water interface; or sunken into sediment), and finally the target(s) location - the GIS-based pre-search strategy allows the most appropriate search assets to be deployed.
Development of WPR in freshwater environments
Through terrestrial-based casework for humanitarian search/rescue and law enforcement, agencies often ask for assistance in freshwater searches: Ruffell (2006) applied GPR on water (“WPR”) to resolve a dispute following a collision between a jet-ski and speedboat in a recreational lake in Ireland [ R5]. This was the first geoforensic research publication pioneering WPR use. WPR fills a niche in the application of aqueous geophysics for sub-bottom profiling, in that it allows exploration of small (from ca. 0.1 ha) freshwater bodies where deployment of other techniques such as seismic surveying are problematic due to boat size and tow fish required. The speed with which WPR data can be gathered in such locations makes this method useful for the search of such water bodies. Challenges also exist in terms of what technical (e.g. antenna type, design, flotation method, survey method) and environmental (e.g. water chemistry, temperature, gas content) constraints exist – the research led by Ruffell has refined this technique, testing it for a range of conditions and targets [R6], making it an attractive and highly applicable tool in the wider suite of search assets.
Fig. 1. Aquatic Geoforensics in action. A: Operation Amos (weapon search, Leicester); B: Operation Abermule (double homicide search, Inverness); C: Operation Igneous (homicide search, Falkirk); D: Operation Bennet (missing persons search, Fraserburgh). Faces are obscured for security reasons.
In the experience of the authors, search personnel can sometimes place too much faith in one or more methods or devices, when these must be used appropriately, conjunctively, and with caution that accommodates the known limitations of each technique. The spatial approach outlined above and detailed in the underpinning research section, is new in the forensic search of freshwater water bodies.
In recognition of the pioneering research detailed above and for his outreach contributions to forensic science, Ruffell was awarded the William Smith Medal by the Geological Society of London in 2020. McKinley, who has led the application of GIS-based methodologies to forensic problems, was nominated to the International Union of Geological Sciences ( IUGS) Executive Council by the Initiative on Forensic Geology ( IFG) (and successfully elected in 2020).
3. References to the research
R1: Ruffell, A. & Kulessa, B. (2009). Applications of geophysical techniques in identifying illegally buried toxic waste. Environmental Forensics, 10, 196-207. doi.org/10.1080/15275920903130230
R2: Ruffell, A., Pringle, J.K., Cassella, J.P., Morgan, R.M., Ferguson, M. Heaton, V.G., Hope, C. McKinley, J.M. (2017). The use of geoscience methods for aquatic forensic searches. Earth-Science Reviews, 117, 323-327. doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.04.012
R3: Ruffell, A. (2014). Lacustrine flow (divers, side-scan Sonar, hydrogeology, water penetrating radar) used to understand the location of a submerged human body. Journal of Hydrology, 513, 164-168. doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.041
R4: Ruffell, A. & Donnelly, L.J. (2018). Forensic geophysics and the search of building interiors, peat bogs and water. In: Barone, P-M. & Groen, M. (Eds.) Multidisciplinary Approaches to Forensic Archaeology. Soil Forensics. Springer-Cham.
R5: Ruffell, A. (2006). Under-water Scene Investigation using Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) in the Search for a Sunken Jet ski, Northern Ireland. Science & Justice, 46, 150-159. doi:10.1016/S1355-0306(06)71602-1
R6: Parker, R., Ruffell, A., Hughes, D. & Pringle, J. (2010). Geophysics and the search of
freshwater bodies: a review. Science & Justice, 50, 141-149. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2009.09.001
4. Details of the impact
Highlights:
Following our pioneering work [e.g. R5,R6], search specialists in the National Crime Agency [ E1] and Home Office [ E2] became aware of the QUB research and criminal casework when searching on water. These two agencies have consistently asked for our support in applying our search methodology in problematic locations for serious crime investigations. Nine other organisations have requested similar assistance ( Section a).
Through the IUGS Initiative on Forensic Geology ( IFG) and European Network of Forensic Sciences, we have provided training internationally to over 200 police officers/forensic investigators throughout Europe, Brazil, Colombia, Argentina and Australia (Section b).
Outreach and public engagement have helped to raise the profile of our multi-proxy water-based search methodologies and geoforensic science more broadly (Section c).
a. Casework
As a result of our research expertise described above, we received multiple requests from law enforcement bodies (police, environment agency, humanitarian, military ([ E1, E2, E3]) and search and rescue personnel, to assist in searches of water that * applied our three-step methodology. Freshwater locations may possess submerged hazards, limited access, vegetation infestation, and often have few landmarks, making them difficult search environments. This has resulted in innovation-driven aquatic geoforensic research developed in conjunction with law enforcement and search professionals, each of whom observed the work and/or report here on the impact. In sequence, the following have asked for assistance described in this Impact Case Study:
** 1.** Fire & Rescue Service, N. Ireland* - search for sunken jet-ski (Co. Down), 2004 ( R5)
** 2. Northern Ireland Environment Agency* - illegal waste in a flooded quarry, 2006 ( R1)
** 3**.** An Garda Síochána search - drowned suicide victim, Fermanagh/Cavan, 2010 ( R3)
** 4.** Joint *NW England Police Dive Unit * / Home Office - canal survey, Liverpool, 2015 [E2]
** 5.** W. Midlands Police/Home Office* homicide search (flooded quarry), Dudley, 2015 [E1,E2]
** 6.** Police Scotland* search for missing person (flooded bog; Fig.1D), Fraserburgh, 2015
** 7.** Police Scotland* search for missing child, Coatbridge, Lanarkshire (Fig.1C), 2016 [E2]
** 8**. Leicestershire Police* search for a weapon (attempted homicide; Fig.1A), 2017 [E2]
** 9. Police Scotland* flooded quarry search (2 x homicide) Inverness, 2018/19 [E3]
** 10.** National Crime Agency*, Cyprus - survey advice, two flooded quarries, 2019 [E1]
** 11**.** Netherlands Forensic Institute - advice to search for sunken vehicle, 2019 [E4]
** 12**.** Training for the International Commission on Missing Persons ( ICMP) and
EQUITAS (humanitarian organisation), Bogota, Colombia, 2020 [E5]
The Major Crime Investigation Support Inspector of the National Crime Agency (responsible for advising on strategic, tactical and operational matters relating to major crime, complex and high-profile Police search operations throughout the UK) said of our work in 2019:
“*Dr Alastair Ruffell, who assists myself, other Police colleagues and staff from the Defence Science & Technology Laboratory (Home Office) during such operations where his advanced knowledge and technical abilities are essential… he has developed (and continues to research) a standard operating procedure for forensic searches that deploys a GIS-based desktop study, modified boats/equipment and a geospatial multiproxy approach using the GPR together with Sonar and lightweight probes. I am unaware of anyone else in the UK or Europe and indeed much of the world doing this kind of work: some United States forces have used the method (e.g. the search and recovery of Gregory Reedy, Oregon)*. Some operations I have worked with Alastair on include:
Search for a missing person, likely a homicide victim in a flooded quarry near Dudley, West Midlands
Canal search for the body of Moira Anderson, believed killed in 1957 (Lanarkshire)
Search for a weapon used in an attempted homicide, Derby (Trent & Mersey Canal)
*Search for two victims of suspected homicide near Inverness." * [E1]
Writing about Ruffell’s work with the Home Office Defence, Science & Technology Laboratory, a member of the Frontline Support Search Team said in 2019:
“*His survey allowed divers to recover two items below silt level… which allowed the investigation to move forward. I have spent many hours with Alastair and have found his help and insight invaluable as we have been able to exchange ideas to aid police investigations... Our combined expertise allows police forces to make informed decisions with the surveys using these unique capabilities”*. [E2]
A Police Scotland Detective in the Specialist Crime Division stated,
“Without your involvement and expertise I doubt whether we could have come up with the successful search strategy we did.” [E3]
b. Professional Training and CPD Significance
- Law Enforcement Agency Training:** The cases above resulted in invited training events in water-borne GPR deployment run by McKinley and Ruffell under the framework of IUGS-IFG, including: (i) Messina, Sicily, 2014 (for Italian Police and university students); (ii) Canberra, Australia, 2014 (for Federal Police); (iii) Brasilia, Brazil, 2013 (for Brazilian Federal Police); (iv) Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2015 (for Colombian and Argentine law enforcement); (v) a training session in the European Meeting of Forensic Archaeologists (EMFA) 2016, Dublin (with Garda Síochána and >5 other agencies); (vi) an EMFA training weekend in Preston, University of Central Lancashire (UCLAN) (attended by 45 participants, including the Netherlands Forensic Institute, Swedish and UK police) (2019). **These events all included demonstration geophysical tests (for forensic search) and forensic GIS workshops, with discussions around specific applications and needs. ** For example, in the EMFA event (vi above) the focus was on canal search techniques. In the Australian and Brazilian events, McKinley organised more advanced training in the use of spatial data in criminalistics for search, sampling and scene management for crime scene management.
The ICMP Scientific Advisor in Colombia stated in 2020:
“Search and recovery in aquatic contexts is a topic of great importance in Colombia, and is considered a very complex topic. We were honoured to have Dr. Ruffell share his knowledge with us and discuss the process of search and recovery with us…we all learned a great deal about novel and advanced techniques and approaches, some of which the participants will surely put into practice…” [E5]
In summary, training has been provided for law enforcement, search and rescue, fraud investigations, humanitarian agencies, government forensic scientists, and NGOs who use and develop the methods shown here.
Other events: In addition to the above, we promoted our aquatic geoforensics work through the following conferences: (i) **European Meeting of Forensic Archaeologists annual conference which we hosted in Belfast, 2018 (with 59 participants, including major crime forensic advisors (e.g. Head of ICLVR; Head of PSNI Body Recovery Unit) and a crime scene fieldtrip; (ii) Japanese Geological Society Annual Conference, 2015, Nagano (at the invitation of Detective Sugita, Japanese Police); and (iii) Institute of Forensic Archaeologists conference (Bradford, 2016), amongst other events.
c. Public engagement and outreach
Media articles: Our aquatic search casework has stimulated and enhanced public understanding of forensic science, as indicated by our non-specialist outputs and media publications (see E6). These include articles in The Conversation and Police Professional. In some instances where aquatic search was undertaken (e.g. the Coatbridge Canal case for Police Scotland 2016), significant profiling in the media led directly to outreach publications and newspaper articles [ E6A, E6B]. Wider high profile crime-related news (e.g. the death of Ian Brady) provided further opportunities to promote our work through outreach [e.g., E6D , E6E]. Collectively, these outreach activities widened public knowledge and understanding of the role our work plays in criminal search. Because much of our casework is sensitive in nature, it is not always appropriate to publicise details of our activities, and we often request to remain anonymous due to the security situation in Northern Ireland.
Community and School Events:** To further extend the reach of our work, we delivered >20 invited talks to community groups and school/university students in NI and GB including: (i) annual talks to the Blind and Partly Sighted Group, N. Ireland; (ii) University of the Third Age (Taunton, 2018); (iii) SW England Geological Society Regional Group (2017); (iv) Leicester University Geological Society (2016); and (v) Donegal County Council (2019). The latter event was attended by Garda officers, widening our network in RoI. We also ran popular sessions at two large Science Festivals ( Belfast 2016; Monaghan 2017), both including interactive 'problem-based' learning where participants were tasked with solving a crime.
Education:** Geoforensic water-search approaches are integrated within a QUB UG module (GGY3049 Geoforensics; ~70 students) and UG dissertations (2-5 per year). Former student McCutcheon used this training to secure employment as a Detective Inspector in PSNI. Ruffell delivers an annual class on forensic science to Ulster University Law students, increasing forensic knowledge in the next generation of lawyers. Ruffell and McKinley delivered an invited forensic geoscience workshop for Hong Kong University in 2015, raising awareness of the impacts arising from the research amongst students and staff.
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
[E1] Letter from the Major Crime Investigation Support Inspector, National Crime Agency.
[E2] Email from a member of the Frontline Support Search Team, DSTL ( Department of Science & Technology, UK Home Office/MI5)
[E3] Email from a Police Scotland Detective in the Specialist Crime Division.
[E4] Email from a Forensic Archaeologist, the Netherlands Forensic Institute.
[E5] Letter from a Forensic Coordinator for the International Commission for Missing Persons (ICMP) in Colombia
[E6] Geoforensics in popular media. Multiple sources in one pdf comprising:
Ruffell, A. & Pringle, J. 2019. Buried Evidence. Police Professional*, 24th January, 2019, p. 22-23. * a UK-based magazine on new advances, distributed to all police forces.
Ruffell, A., Pringle, J. & Morgan, R. The long arm of the (geoforensics) law. Geoscientist, 29, 26-27, 2019; https://www.geolsoc.org.uk/Geoscientist/Archive/
Ruffell, A. 2017. How science is helping the police search for bodies in water. The Conversation. 23rd March, 2017. http://theconversation.com/how-science-is-helping-the-police-search-for-bodies-in-water-73931
Pringle, J. & Ruffell, A. 2017. The science of finding buried bodies. The Conversation, 17th May, 2017. https://theconversation.com/the-science-of-finding-buried-bodies-77803
Ruffell, A., 2017. How science is helping the police search for bodies in water. The Independent, 29th March, 2017. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/how\-science\-helping\-police\-search\-bodies\-water\-a7647421.html